Comments on: My Angel is a Centerfold? http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/ Yo Quiero Takako Bell Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:32:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Hayate no Gotoku 35-36 at hontou ni sou omou? http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/#comment-68256 Hayate no Gotoku 35-36 at hontou ni sou omou? Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:46:32 +0000 http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/#comment-68256 [...] the AMG reference which just so wrong but also so funny. It’s even worse than realizing that My Angel is the Centrefold; Admiral Ackbar, you have no idea, [...] [...] the AMG reference which just so wrong but also so funny. It’s even worse than realizing that My Angel is the Centrefold; Admiral Ackbar, you have no idea, [...]

]]> By: omo http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/#comment-67963 omo Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:24:52 +0000 http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/#comment-67963 late to the party but I've been working on 8th MS team this past half a year, and it does look pretty tight even lol TEN YEARS AFTER. But it was a remastered version, so it does look better than the original. I'm trying to get my hands on the remastered version of Escaflowne. That show ages really, really well. late to the party but I’ve been working on 8th MS team this past half a year, and it does look pretty tight even lol TEN YEARS AFTER. But it was a remastered version, so it does look better than the original.

I’m trying to get my hands on the remastered version of Escaflowne. That show ages really, really well.

]]> By: Jesus159159159 http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/#comment-67952 Jesus159159159 Sat, 22 Dec 2007 01:32:52 +0000 http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/#comment-67952 <blockquote>is entirely <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=oab0sP-v0D4" rel="nofollow">cringeworthy</a></blockquote> oh em gee! I never knew "Haros" were from old Gundam series! I always thought they first came out in Gundum Seed! I'm (somewhat) afraid to rewatch the Tenchi Muyo series, which happens to be one of my favorites. Alot of people say the Tenchi Universe/Tenchi in Tokyo suck, but I actually enjoyed them when they came out in Cartoon Network (probably because I was too small to realize what was good/what wasn't). Also, I heard the new OVAs are so-so, so I've just been running away from the series...BUT I MUST FACE THIS OBSTICAL!!!...but i don't like dl-ing series that are already licensed...*sad* The scary Copyright FBI already caught me twice dl-ing illegal stuff I'm currently watching a great 1980s anime called Touch! My bro and mom both enjoy it alot! :3 I'm glad my mom finally accepts anime! Sometimes you just have to dig up the old stuff to reel in the old timers (can't believe I just called my mom old...HOPE SHE DON'T READ DIS YO!!!) <blockquote> And Totali, the early 90’s definitely had a lot of good things going for it, but MC Hammer was definitely *not* one of them! :)</blockquote> Why the mention of MC Hammer?! Is there a reference about Totali I don't know about? *depressed* (and i love MC Hammer...) <strong>Edit</strong>: Oh man, I didn't realize Ender wrote this! THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THIS HAPPENED! You guys really need to change the writer name color of the "this post was written by" text :(.... maybe its just me

is entirely cringeworthy

oh em gee! I never knew “Haros” were from old Gundam series! I always thought they first came out in Gundum Seed!

I’m (somewhat) afraid to rewatch the Tenchi Muyo series, which happens to be one of my favorites. Alot of people say the Tenchi Universe/Tenchi in Tokyo suck, but I actually enjoyed them when they came out in Cartoon Network (probably because I was too small to realize what was good/what wasn’t). Also, I heard the new OVAs are so-so, so I’ve just been running away from the series…BUT I MUST FACE THIS OBSTICAL!!!…but i don’t like dl-ing series that are already licensed…*sad* The scary Copyright FBI already caught me twice dl-ing illegal stuff

I’m currently watching a great 1980s anime called Touch! My bro and mom both enjoy it alot! :3 I’m glad my mom finally accepts anime! Sometimes you just have to dig up the old stuff to reel in the old timers (can’t believe I just called my mom old…HOPE SHE DON’T READ DIS YO!!!)

And Totali, the early 90’s definitely had a lot of good things going for it, but MC Hammer was definitely *not* one of them! :)

Why the mention of MC Hammer?! Is there a reference about Totali I don’t know about? *depressed* (and i love MC Hammer…)

Edit: Oh man, I didn’t realize Ender wrote this! THIS IS THE SECOND TIME THIS HAPPENED! You guys really need to change the writer name color of the “this post was written by” text :(…. maybe its just me

]]> By: Epi http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/#comment-67906 Epi Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:53:24 +0000 http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/#comment-67906 I agree with your assessment. Anime like any of the modern visual artforms has a variety of reasons which would make any of it good or not. Production values are extremely important, but then again so is story and direction. For instance, even with it's fake 'night' scenes, and crappy special effects, The Bridge Over the River Kwai is still a classic movie quite worthy of watching. In the same vein, well directed OVAs like the original Gunbuster (which also had good animation mind you), Macross DYRL, and most Ghibli/Miyazaki will probably always be good in my book. Still even crappy animation can have it's day. I'm currently watching Ranma 1/2 for the first time (well I originally saw the first 12 episodes about 8 years ago), and even with the ridiculously low production values it's still a totally awesome show worthy of watching. Meanwhile Love Hina now looks so cliched with so many bad filler episodes that I wonder how it could have been my favorite anime in the past. I agree with your assessment. Anime like any of the modern visual artforms has a variety of reasons which would make any of it good or not. Production values are extremely important, but then again so is story and direction. For instance, even with it’s fake ‘night’ scenes, and crappy special effects, The Bridge Over the River Kwai is still a classic movie quite worthy of watching.

In the same vein, well directed OVAs like the original Gunbuster (which also had good animation mind you), Macross DYRL, and most Ghibli/Miyazaki will probably always be good in my book.

Still even crappy animation can have it’s day. I’m currently watching Ranma 1/2 for the first time (well I originally saw the first 12 episodes about 8 years ago), and even with the ridiculously low production values it’s still a totally awesome show worthy of watching.

Meanwhile Love Hina now looks so cliched with so many bad filler episodes that I wonder how it could have been my favorite anime in the past.

]]> By: Onion http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/#comment-67868 Onion Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:25:52 +0000 http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/#comment-67868 Well spoken. I remember having almost this exact same conversation with a friend after trying to get her to watch Macross with me. "You'll love the fight scenes! The animation is great." Amazingly, I did get her to watch it (the movie), Robot-fighting junkie that she is. Well spoken. I remember having almost this exact same conversation with a friend after trying to get her to watch Macross with me.

“You’ll love the fight scenes! The animation is great.” Amazingly, I did get her to watch it (the movie), Robot-fighting junkie that she is.

]]> By: Kabitzin http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/#comment-67866 Kabitzin Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:21:10 +0000 http://www.seaslugteam.com/archives/2007/12/15/my-angel-is-a-centerfold/#comment-67866 Those two are not mutually exclusive of course. Those two are not mutually exclusive of course.

]]>